An AI detector that shows you the sentences.
Upload a draft and Plagino scores it sentence by sentence, matches passages against open academic literature, and hands back a PDF you can read line by line — not a single number you have to guess at.
3 free scans every month. No card required. See pricing.
Two checks, one report.
Every upload runs through AI detection and source matching, and comes back as a document you can read line by line.
Sentence-level AI detection
Not just a document score. Plagino marks the exact sentences that read as AI-generated, so you know what to rewrite.
Academic source matching
Passages are matched against open academic literature and your own prior uploads, with every match listed.
PDF report
Every finished scan produces a shareable PDF with the highlights and the matched source list.
One list, nothing else
Your dashboard is a list of files with the AI score, the plagiarism score, and a link to the report. No dials to read.
Local enterprises now use predictive analytics to identify candidates. This transformative shift represents a paradigm change in workforce management across the region. Screening tools parse thousands of resumes in minutes. It is essential to understand the limitations inherent in these systems.
2 of 4 sentences flagged
Draft in, report out.
Three steps, and only one of them is yours.
- 1
Upload your draft
Drop in a .docx up to 10MB. Nothing to install, no formatting to fix first.
- 2
We run both checks
Our in-house detector scores the writing sentence by sentence while passages are matched against academic sources.
- 3
Read the report
Usually within a couple of minutes you get an AI score, a plagiarism score, and a PDF with every flagged passage marked.
How AI detection works, and where it stops
A detector is a probability estimate. Selling it as anything firmer than that is how students end up accused on the strength of a number nobody explained to them.
What does an AI detector actually measure?
It measures how predictable your writing is. Language models pick likely words, so text they generate tends to sit closer to the statistical middle of a sentence than a person's writing does. A detector scores that regularity and reports where it runs high.
That is a signal, not a confession. It says a passage reads the way generated text usually reads — nothing about who typed it, and nothing about intent.
Can an AI detector be wrong?
Yes, in both directions, and every detector on the market is. Plain, careful, formulaic prose reads as predictable whether a model or a person wrote it, which is why writing to a rubric, writing in a second language, and technical description all draw flags they should not.
Editing cuts the other way: a generated draft that has been rewritten in your own words can slip past. Treat any score as a prompt to reread a passage rather than as evidence about it.
What should I do with a flagged sentence?
Read it back. If it says something you meant, in words you would use, leave it — a flag is not an instruction to rewrite. If it reads like filler you would not defend in a viva, that is worth fixing whatever produced it.
The report exists so the decision stays yours. It shows the sentences and the matched sources, and stops there.
Plagino is not the checker your institution runs, and no third-party tool can reproduce another one’s score. It shows you what an automated check tends to flag, before someone else runs one.